|
Richard McEntee 2008 Washington State
Auditor Candidate LifePac Recommended |
|
2008 LifePac Survey Response
As submitted by Richard McEntee
Responses in Green Text are candidate's answers.
THE NATURE OF PRO-LIFE
ISSUES
1. Direct threats to innocent human life include first of all the issues
of: abortion, which takes the lives of well over a million US children
annually; embryonic stem cell harvesting; direct euthanasia; and cloning.
In addition, by using the consistent ethic of life principle in defending
life, various other threats to human life have been identified. Often
included among these issues are poverty, capital punishment, racism, unjust
war, nuclear arms proliferation and exploitation. Each and every human
being is unique and important, and one's personhood or worth should not be
arbitrarily determined by another's choice. No one exists solely as a means
to someone else's happiness. The choices we make, as individuals and as a
society, must be weighed in light of their impact on human life and
dignity.
Yes No
PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE
2.
State Initiative 1000 currently seeks to
legalize Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) by allowing doctors to prescribe
lethal doses of barbiturates to certain patients. The objection to this
sanctioning of suicide is that some vulnerable persons, such as those who
are feeble, depressed, mentally ill, or handicapped, will likely experience
pressures from others to end their lives. For them a right to die, already
protected in the Natural Death Act, (RCW
70.122), may become a duty to die. The
American Medical Association (policy
H-140.952) as well as the Washington State
Medical Association (2007
Resolution A-7) oppose PAS. The AMA states
that "physician assisted suicide is fundamentally inconsistent with the
physician's professional role." The initiative uses vague language that
enable doctors "acting in good faith" to assist mentally ill or depressed
patients to commit suicide, while protecting doctors from civil and criminal
lawsuits. Health care insurers could cut costs by approving prescriptions
for suicide. Will society's sanction of suicide have unintended
consequences? Sponsor and former governor Booth Gardner says that this is
only a “first step” in legalizing assisted suicide for anyone who wants it.
When society fails to protect vulnerable people in their troubles, but
instead offers them the self inflicted violence of suicide, has not society
abandoned and betrayed them? Do
you oppose I-1000's attempt to legalize Physician Assisted Suicide in
Washington State?
Yes No
ABORTION
3.
The 14th Amendment says "nor shall any state
deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws." The Supreme Court in
Roe v. Wade, 1973, stated that "if this
suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course,
collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed
specifically by the [14th] Amendment." The Court regrettably concluded that
"we need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those
trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology
are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the
development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the
answer." Do you
believe that life begins at conception and is present throughout pregnancy,
and that, therefore, the State has a compelling interest in protecting that
life from conception?
Yes No
4. Do you believe that a unique human life begins at conception?
If not, when? ___ 3 mths ___ 6 mths ___ 9 mths ___ 1 yr ___ 18 yrs? |
Yes No |
5. Is taking the life of a pre-born child through
abortion ever permissible? Check all that apply:
_X_ No, it's never permissible _____ Yes, to save mother's life _____ Yes, in cases of rape or incest _____ Yes, for physical deformity |
_____ Yes, for gender
_____ Yes, for race _____ Yes, to punish spouse _____ Yes, it's always permissible |
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS
6. Do you oppose federal funding for embryonic stem cell research or
cloning?
Yes No
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT
IN ABORTION
7. Peer reviewed scientific studies have shown that parental involvement
laws reduce the occurrence of risky sex in teens, and more than 30 states
currently have some form of them. Either the teen refrains from engaging in
sex or is more careful before having sex. These laws help teen mothers and
fathers get the support and guidance they need from parents in this
important decision. Not having them risks parental estrangement or
alienation from the child when in the greatest need and denies the dignity
of the family. Minors already must have parental approval for even the most
minor types of medical procedures or medications and should also for the
complex procedure of abortion. Without parental involvement, a minor
impregnated by an adult often times is pressured into having an abortion so
as to conceal the fact that the adult is guilty of statutory rape.
Will you promote/support parental
involvement laws (with judicial override) for minors when seeking an
abortion?
Yes No
MARRIAGE PRESERVATION
8. Children develop best within the context of the natural family.
This is a scientifically proven fact which the
Washington State Supreme Court referenced when
in 2006, it ruled on the state's 1998 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The
court determined that the state's limitation of marriage to heterosexual
couples "is constitutional because the legislature was entitled to believe
that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers ... the well-being
of children by encouraging families where children are reared in homes
headed by the children’s biological parents." In concurrence,
Justice James Johnson wrote "The unique and
binary biological nature of marriage and its exclusive link with procreation
and responsible child rearing has defined the institution [of marriage in
law]." In order to
affirm and protect children’s rights and the primacy of those rights over
adults’ aspirations for novel family forms, do you oppose laws that change
the definition of marriage to include homosexual and polygamous
relationships?
Yes No
MEDICAL
CONSCIENCE CLAUSES
9. Should doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other medical professionals
be granted the right to refuse participation in the provision of medical
services that violate the person's moral, ethical or religious beliefs?
Yes No
PUBLIC SCHOOL SEX EDUCATION
10. The Washington State Legislature in 2007 passed
ESSB 5297 requiring school districts to teach
"scientifically accurate" (aka comprehensive) sex education, if they teach
sex ed at all. The typical comprehensive sex education program spend as
little as 5% of the time teaching abstinence principles (Zogby
3/27/07), instead spending significantly more
of their time teaching students how to put condoms on models of male
genitalia and promoting alternative forms of sexual activity called
outercourse, which may include showering together and mutual masturbation as
effective ways to avoid pregnancy and disease. In contrast, an emphasis on
abstinence means teaching students about building healthy relationships and
bolstering self worth and self-control.
Given that ESSB 5297 allows school
districts a wide range in how they apply the law, will you work to maximize
sex education that is wholesome and truly safe?
Yes No
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
11. The death penalty in the United States should:
not be used | be used about the same |
be used less | be used more |
GAMING
12. A proposed casino off I-5 near
Ridgefield is projected to be one of the largest in the nation. What is
your position on the building of this casino?
Mark an “X” along the continuum for your answer.
____________________________________________________________________________
Fully Support |
Neutral |
Fully Oppose |
QUALIFICATIONS AND COMMENTS
13. Please state your qualifications for office such as professional,
educational, family and community accomplishments. You may also add any any
further comments regarding the relationship of your candidacy to respect
life issues.
SEE BELOW
WEBSITE POSTING
14. May LifePac post a digital image of your returned survey on its
website?
Yes No
Dear Friends of Life,
My late wife Kathy and I have been involved extensively in Right to Life activities in our State and Nationally for almost 40 years. We worked to oppose Referendum 20 in 1970. I was a board member and served as president of Human Life of Washington in 1978. Kathy started the March for Life that year and led that work tirelessly for over 30 years. I continue as a board member and treasurer of MFL. I have been pro-life chair of my Knights of Columbus council for several years.
I have spoken in public and lectured concerning the importance of the understanding of life beginning at conception and that the State has an obligation to protect the rights of the unborn--without exception. Also, I have written and spoken extensively concerning the distinction between the general term, 'stem cell research' and 'embryonic stem cell research' and the failure of embryonic stem cell efforts. I have led a number of sessions concerning the need to defeat Initiative 1000 because of the dangers to human life embodied in such legislation.
Of course, parental involvement is essential in the teaching and decisions regarding the actions of their children. Marriage between and man and women must remain as the essential unit of family and care and education of their children. Even if they are unable to have children, their example to others requires their dedication to their union. Changing the definition of marriage is certain to destroy our nation's fabric.
Also, you should know that I have been involved behind the scenes in the efforts to protect the rights of pharmacists to refuse to dispense Plan B abortifacients.
Regarding my qualifications, details can be found in my presentation in the Voters' Pamphlet. Briefly, I am a leader but not a politician. As the 7th of 8 children of a miner and homemaker, I worked my way through Villanova University, earning a degree in Chemical Engineering. While pursuing a career in business, I added to my education with certificated AMA courses in management and finance. I was recruited by Nalley's Fine Foods and progressed to a senior executive position, leading a workforce of over 900 to world-class achievements in productivity, quality and regulatory compliance. I was valuations chief for the parent company's Merger & Acquisition Team. During my years there and subsequently, I was elected to the Fircrest City Council, served 10 years as Trustee of St. Joseph's Hospital in Tacoma, appointed by Pierce County Council to the Economic Development Corporation, appointed by Governor Gardner to the State's Food Processing Advisory Commission, served as President of a national trade association, named as first President of St. Charles Borromeo Parish Council, Treasurer of Pierce County Republican Party, Grand Knight of St. Charles Knights of Columbus Council and am currently a member of the Public Safety Commission of the City of University Place. I now am Vice President and Chief Government Compliance Officer for an investment management firm. I have volunteered as piano player and dishwasher for a number of charitable fund raisers and have coached boys and girls baseball and basketball teams.
One final note: My major opponent and incumbent, Sonntag, has previously received an endorsement from NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League) while giving a 100% pro-abort response to them . His position is that the State Auditor has no influence on the issues of life and family so his position is not important. Nothing could be further from the truth. All elected officials, particularly those in State Executive positions, can have an important influence on how State policies and legislation proceeds. I hope to be elected to show how that can be accomplished.
Thank you very much for your care and concern about the issues that affect the unborn and most vulnerable in our state.
God Bless you,
J. Richard (Dick) McEntee