Life Issues / Family Ethics Political Action Committee of Southwest Washington 

Election News and Commentary

Clark County Election Board

2006 Election Page

2004 Election Page

Washington State Elections Office

2005 Election Page

2003 Election Page

"America is great because she is good. If America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." Alexis de Tocqueville .....................

 

Leading Abortion Activist Will Help John Edwards' Presidential Campaign

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
January 8, 2007

 

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- One of the top abortion activists in the United States has signed on to assist former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards as he undertakes a second campaign for president. Kate Michelman, who was the president of NARAL for almost 20 years, will serve as a senior campaign advisor.

Edwards campaigned for the Democratic nomination in 2004 and ran a better race than political observers expected. He wound up the vice presidential nominee running alongside pro-abortion Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry.

Michelman endorsed Kerry's candidacy and was spotlighted in an infamous photo at a pro-abortion rally hugging the candidate.

In her role with the Edwards campaign, Michelman will conduct outreach to women voters.

Full story at: http://www.lifenews.com/nat2855.html

 

Sen. Patty Murray avoids C-word, opts for 'holiday' at national lighting ceremony
Posted: December 7, 2006
By Joe Kovacs
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

When Democrats won control of Congress in November's election, the victory may have reignited a controversy many Americans thought had been settled a year ago – and that is what to call the national tree in front of the U.S. Capitol.

In 2005, Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., instructed federal officials to refer to it as the "Capitol Christmas Tree," after having been called the "Capitol Holiday Tree" since the 1990s.

But at last night's lighting ceremony for the 65-foot Pacific Silver Fir, the Democrat senator from the tree's home state of Washington never used the word "Christmas" in her speech to the assembled crowd, opting instead for the term "holiday tree" twice.


 
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., called this a "holiday tree" while House Speaker Dennis Hastert referred to it as a "Christmas tree" during last night's 43rd annual lighting of the "U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree"

"It is so wonderful and such an honor to be here tonight in the nation's capital as we light what we all believe from the other end of the country is the best holiday tree ever," said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.

"I am very proud of everyone in my home state who helped make this happen – all of our staffs who worked so hard; everyone who helped bring this tree out here; everyone who has worked incredibly hard, especially the young children who helped decorate this tree. So, tonight, we share with the nation what makes our state so spectacular: a bit of our spirit, a holiday tree."

Murray was in the minority in her use of "holiday tree," as the event's master of ceremonies, Alan Hantman, the architect of the Capitol, called it "the U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree."

Additionally, Murray was immediately followed by a performance by the National Presbyterian School Chorus, which sang "O Christmas Tree."

Full story at: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53275

 

Insightful Post Election Commentary

'They just don't get it'
is why Republicans lost
Dobson, Bauer, Minnery, Perkins
say GOP ignored voters' values

By Bob Unruh
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
November 9, 2006

The so-called "values voters" who handed both houses of Congress and the White House to Republicans in 2000 and 2004 were at this year's election, they just didn't see anybody promising to represent them, according to several leaders influential to that group of Americans.

"The unfortunate thing is that Republican leaders still don't appear to get it. Sen. Arlen Spector, R-Pa., said on Wednesday that the election results represented a 'seismic earthquake' and that his party must become 'a lot more progressive and a lot less ideological,'" said James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family and director of its dozens of publications and broadcast service that reaches about five million Americans daily.

"Dick Armey emerged from four years in the wilderness to blame conservative Christians for Tuesday's defeat. They were, he said, 'too involved' with the party. He can't be serious! Someone should tell him that without the support of that specific constituency, John Kerry would be president and the Republicans would have fallen into a black hole in '04," he said.

Full article at: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52884

***********************************************************

Senate Vote Tally on Embryonic Stem Cell Research Funding Bill
July 18, 2006

Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Alexander (R-TN), Yea
Allard (R-CO), No
Allen (R-VA), No
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), No
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), No
Bunning (R-KY), No
Burns (R-MT), No
Burr (R-NC), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Chambliss (R-GA), No
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Coburn (R-OK), No
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Coleman (R-MN), No
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Cornyn (R-TX), No
Craig (R-ID), No
Crapo (R-ID), No
Dayton (D-MN), Yea
DeMint (R-SC), No
DeWine (R-OH), No
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dole (R-NC), No
 
Domenici (R-NM), No
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Ensign (R-NV), No
Enzi (R-WY), No
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Graham (R-SC), No
Grassley (R-IA), No
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagel (R-NE), No
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), No
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), No
Jeffords (I-VT), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), No
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Martinez (R-FL), No
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
 
McConnell (R-KY), No
Menendez (D-NJ), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), No
Obama (D-IL), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), No
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Salazar (D-CO), Yea
Santorum (R-PA), No
Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), No
Shelby (R-AL), No
Smith (R-OR), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Sununu (R-NH), No
Talent (R-MO), No
Thomas (R-WY), No
Thune (R-SD), No
Vitter (R-LA), No
Voinovich (R-OH), No
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
 

Full story at: http://www.lifenews.com/bio1636.html

*******************************************

N.Y. top court rules against gay marriage
Updated 7/6/2006  
 
 
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — New York's highest court ruled Thursday that gay marriage is not allowed under state law, rejecting arguments by same-sex couples who said the law violates their constitutional rights.

The Court of Appeals, in a 4-2 decision, said New York's marriage law is constitutional and clearly limits marriage to between a man and a woman.

Any change in the law would have to come from the state Legislature, Judge Robert Smith said.

"We do not predict what people will think generations from now, but we believe the present generation should have a chance to decide the issue through its elected representatives," Smith wrote.

Gov. George Pataki's health department and state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's office had argued New York law prohibits issuing licenses to same-sex couples. The state had prevailed in lower appeals courts.

Full story at: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-07-06-ny-gay-marriage_x.htm?csp=24

*******************************************

Eyman stumbles with gay-rights challenge

6/6/2006, 7:44 p.m. PT
By RACHEL LA CORTE
The Associated Press

 OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Initiative activist Tim Eyman and other foes of
Washington state's new gay civil rights law failed to submit enough voter
signatures Tuesday to force a public vote this fall.

Eyman, appearing at the state elections division just minutes before closing
time, said he and allies had collected 105,103 signatures. That's fewer than
the 112,440 minimum required and considerably less than the 130,000 that is
suggested in order to cover duplicate or invalid signatures.

The announcement marked one of the few times that Eyman has failed to
qualify a measure for the ballot - and particularly one with as much seeming
appeal to social and religious conservatives.

Full story at: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/272954_eyman06ww.html?source=rss

God created them male and female, and blessed them saying "be fruitful."

*******************************************

Opponents of bias law seek signers

Church-backed campaign wants repeal of legislation

Jim Camden
Staff writer
May 19, 2006

Voters, not the Legislature, should decide whether the state should add sexual orientation to its anti-discrimination statutes, a pair of Republican legislators said Thursday night.

State Rep. Lynn Schindler, of Spokane Valley, and state Sen. Brad Benson, of Spokane, urged about two dozen people to work with their churches to make a final push for signatures for Referendum 65, a ballot measure that would repeal a law passed and signed this year. H.B. 2661 added sexual orientation to other "protected classes" from discrimination such as gender, race, religion and disability.

Benson argued that there is no statistical proof that homosexuals suffer from discrimination in employment, education or housing, but the statute is so vague it will spawn lawsuits for years. The bill passed, he contended, "because many legislators didn't want to be labeled a bigot."

Schindler told people in the crowd they needed to get out of their chairs and get to work. But they should stick to the legal questions about the law and "voice opinions with respect" to avoid being accused of hate speech.

"It has nothing to do with hatred of the person," Schindler said. "We have the right to say (homosexuality) is wrong, that it is not good for the family."
Full story at: http://www.spokesmanreview.com/tools/story_pf.asp?ID=131610

***************************************************************************

SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/270981_eyman20.html

Eyman, churches link up. Initiative king seeks out evangelicals' help to repeal gay-rights law

Saturday, May 20, 2006

By CHRIS MCGANN
P-I REPORTER


OLYMPIA -- Using a page torn from the Karl Rove playbook, initiative
salesman Tim Eyman has turned to a network of evangelical churches to help
repeal the gay-rights law that the Legislature passed this spring.

Eyman needs to round up 112,440 valid signatures from registered voters by
June 6 to get Referendum 65 on the ballot this fall.

Though early reports indicated a lackluster response to the measure, Eyman
is banking on an 11th-hour surge from as many as 5,400 churches he hopes
will participate in "Referendum Sunday."

"That means that this weekend nearly 500,000 voters are going to hear about
and talk about our effort to get a public vote on House Bill 2661," Eyman
wrote in an e-mail sent to the media and supporters. "They'll be asked to
not only sign the petition but to take petitions home and fill them up and
return them next Sunday."

Full article at: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/270981_eyman20.html

Homosexual "Rights" ?  or Wrongs? ........ How can a Wrong be a "Right"? ........ Simplistic Sexuality is Deceptive and Destructive ......................

*************************************************************

Saturday, May 13, 2006 · Last updated 10:19 a.m. PT

Foes, friends of gay marriage anxious for court ruling

By DAVID AMMONS
AP POLITICAL WRITER

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- Washington's closely watched same-sex marriage case was argued before the state Supreme Court in March of last year, and the long, long wait for a decision continues.

Some court-watchers are now speculating that this hot potato could stay under wraps until after the November election.

Gay marriage and gay rights were a front-burner issue in the Legislature this year, and the buzz over the Oscar-nominated "Brokeback Mountain" seemed to galvanize attention.

After 30 years of debate and disputation, lawmakers finally passed a gay anti-discrimination bill - and even before the governor had signed it, initiative activist Tim Eyman began pushing for a public vote this fall.

Full story at: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420ap_wa_ammons_on_politics.html

*****************************************************************************

VIEWPOINT

Eyman says ‘sexual orientation’ bill gives preferred status
TIM EYMAN
FOR THE BELLINGHAM HERALD

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

We’re sponsoring Referendum 65 to give the voters the chance to close the Pandora’s box that Olympia opened when they passed House Bill 2661.
HB 2661 takes the term “sexual orientation” and defines it in a very unique way. Not only does it include the direction of a person’s sexual desire (“heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality”), but it includes such vague characteristics as “appearance,” “behavior,” “self-image,” and “expression” in their definition. So, under this law, “sexual orientation” includes how you look, how you act, how you feel about yourself, and how you express yourself.

Most states don’t have a law like HB 2661, but even among the few that do, no state has a law written so broadly or so ambiguously.

Why is this bad? In January, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported on HB 2661: “The statewide measure would allow people, for the first time, to sue in state court, where damages could be more lucrative.” It further reported HB 2661 provides “the ability to sue in state court where recovery could include not just compensatory damages, but punitive damages.”
 

Full article at: http://news.bellinghamherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060412/OPINION03/60410005&SearchID=73242327125740

*****************************************************************************

Tuesday, March 29, 2005 (Updated March 7, 2006)
Washington gay marriage ruling looms

 

Nearly half the states now outlaw or are poised to ban same-sex marriage in their constitutions, but one – Washington state – is a court order away from knowing whether it will join Massachusetts in legalizing gay weddings.
 
After hearing arguments in March 2005, the Supreme Court of Washington state is expected to rule any time now to uphold or overturn two lower court rulings in favor of same-sex marriage. It is the first state high court to tackle same-sex marriage since Massachusetts’ highest court issued its ruling legalizing gay unions in November 2003.
 
Both lower courts in Washington struck down as unconstitutional a state law allowing only members of the opposite sex to marry, though there have been no gay nuptials pending appeal to the state Supreme Court. In a victory for gay parents, that court on Nov. 3, 2005, upheld the parenting rights of same-sex partners who are not biologically related to a child they helped to raise. But that ruling turned on state law and so is of limited use in foretelling the court’s leanings on whether the state Constitution prohibits sex discrimination in marriage.

Full story at: http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1&contentId=20695

********************************************************

Jan '06 - Clark County Reconciliation Reports: Votes counted and votes credited for "out of state, overseas and service" different by 506 votes.  See "Reconciliation Reports 1 and 2" under "November 8, 2005 General Election." Clark County Auditor Greg Kimsey explained as follows:

"The explanation of the apparent "discrepancy" on our reports is that the 183 "out-of-state, overseas, and service voters' ballots counted shown on Certification Reconciliation Report, dated November 29, 2005, only includes those out of state voters who are not registered to vote (of which there were none for Clark County), while the 689 "out-of-state, overseas and service voters credited" on the 30 Day Reconciliation Report, dated December 8, 2005, includes all out of state voters (registered and not registered) of which there were 506 for Clark County.

"As a side note, we were very pleased that for the 2005 General Election the difference between the number of ballots tabulated (101,149) and the number of voters given credit for voting (101,148) was one. This difference is probably due to the Inspection Board finding two ballots inside one secrecy envelope and mistakenly allowing both ballots to be tabulated."

The Washington State Elections Department was asked to verify the above explanation.  We heard twice back from a secretary with some general information, but never from Sheryl Moss, the manager of the Certification & Training Department who was suppose to contact us on this specific issue.