web metrics
 

Dino Rossi (R)

2010 Candidate for US Senator

National Right to Life Endorsed Campaign Website Human Life of Washington Recommended for Consideration
 
Human Life of Washington Recommended for Consideration

"Emergency Contraception"

Pro-life group challenges Senate candidate’s support of forcing hospitals to dispense morning-after pill
By Jill Stanek

"In 2002, Dino Rossi voted for SB 6537 which forces hospitals to promote emergency contraception to rape victims and provide it upon request within 72 hours of sexual contact. Emergency contraception, also known as “the morning after pill”, causes an abortion if the woman is pregnant. The bill passed and is now the law in WA state. Physicians, nurses and healthcare workers in hospital emergency rooms are forced to act against their conscience, which is formed by their professional training as well as their moral, ethical and religious views…."

Excerpt retrieved Aug 11, 2010 from http://www.jillstanek.com/2010/08/pro-life-group-challenges-senate-candidate%E2%80%99s-support-of-forcing-hospitals-to-dispense-morning-after-pill-2/


Bill—SB 6537 from 2002 is being used to unjustly depict certain candidates as pro-choice and opposed to ER workers right of conscience. 

By Dan Kennedy
Human Life of Washington
Aug 10, 2010

That conclusion cannot be justified for any who know the facts surrounding its passage. PRIOR TO ITS PASSAGE, PRO-LIFE LEGISLATORS ASKED FOR INPUT FROM HUMAN LIFE AND THE WASHINGTON STATE CATHOLIC CONFERENCE. This bill was specifically approved by the three Catholic bishops and their lobbyist, Sr. Sharon Park indicating it did not promote abortion. It offered contraception options to women who were raped. Pro-life legislators were quite concerned and asked for the analysis. The WSCC signed off on the bill because they stated that conception would not occur in the time period provided in the bill. Assured by WSCC that the drugs in the legislation act as a contraceptive, not an abortifacient, and "hospitals" not ER workers are required to provide, they were further assured no separate "conscience protection" in the bill was necessary. Human Life of WA always pushed to include a conscience clause, because we knew how the abortion lobby twists any legislation, no matter the intent of the Legislature. Whether the legislation accomplished this or not is a different issue.

Excerpt retrieved Aug 11, 2010 from http://humanlife.net/display_news.htm?nid=591