2012 Survey Response:
THE NATURE OF PRO-LIFE ISSUES
1. Direct threats to human life include first of all abortion, which
takes the lives of well over a million US children annually;
embryonic stem cell harvesting; euthanasia; and cloning. Additional
threats to human life include poverty, capital punishment, racism,
war, nuclear arms proliferation and exploitation. Since each and
every human being is unique and important, one's personhood or worth
should not be arbitrarily determined by another's choice. No one
exists solely as a means to someone else's happiness. The choices we
make, as individuals and as a society, must be weighed in light of
their impact on human life and dignity. Do
you acknowledge both the breadth of pro life issues, and the primacy
of some of those issues, namely abortion, embryonic stem cell
harvesting, euthanasia, and cloning?
YES
ABORTION 2. Do you believe that a unique human life begins at
conception? YES
3. The
14th Amendment states
"nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The Supreme Court in Roe
v. Wade, 1973, stated that "if this suggestion of personhood is
established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, for the
fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the
[14th] Amendment." The Court regrettably concluded though that "we
need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When
those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy,
and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary,
at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a
position to speculate as to the answer." Do
you believe that the State has a compelling interest in protecting
human life beginning at conception?
YES – The Declaration of Independence declares these truths to be self-evident,
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life…
It goes on to say that the purpose for government is to secure those
rights. Nothing could be more fundamental.
4. Is taking the life of a pre-born child through
abortion ever morally permissible? Check all that apply:
I know of no situation where the mother would have to die in
order to save the life of the baby. Since the baby’s life
depends on the life of the mother, the mother’s life would need to
be protected. No one has the right to stop an innocent human
heart. If there is ever an exceptional situation where the
mother would die if she were to continue her pregnancy, the first
responsibility is to try to save both lives (mother and baby).
If an exceptional situation could be imagined where only the life of
the mother or the life of the baby could be saved, then those
charged with that responsibility on the scene would have to make
that call.
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS AND CLONING 5. Do you oppose embryonic stem
cell research or human cloning, whether publically or privately
funded? Yes.
There are abundant sources of stem cells without resorting to the
Nazi-like practice of using body parts harvested from innocent
people whose lives were wrongfully taken.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN ABORTION
6. Peer reviewed studies have shown that parental involvement laws
reduce the occurrence of risky sex in teens, and more than 30 states
currently have some form of them. Either the teen refrains from
engaging in sex or is more careful before having sex. These laws
help teen mothers and fathers get the support and guidance they need
from parents in this important decision. Not having them risks
parental estrangement or alienation from the child when in the
greatest need and denies the dignity of the family. Minors already
must have parental approval for even the most minor types of medical
procedures or medications and should also for the complex procedure
of abortion. Without parental involvement, a minor impregnated by an
adult often times is pressured into having an abortion so as to
conceal the fact that the adult is guilty of statutory rape. Do
you support parental involvement laws (with judicial override) for
minors when seeking an abortion? Yes.
In a world where school staff is forbidden to give an aspiring
without the parent’s permission, it is ludicrous to presume that
major surgery can be performed on a child without the parent’s
authorization.
PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE
7. Washington
State Initiative 1000 which
was passed in 2008, legalized Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) by
allowing doctors to prescribe lethal doses of barbiturates to
certain patients. One objection to this sanctioning of suicide is
that some vulnerable persons, such as those who are feeble,
depressed, mentally ill, or handicapped, will likely experience
coercion to end their lives. For them a right to die, already
protected in the Natural Death Act, (RCW
70.122), may become a duty to die. The American Medical
Association (policy H-140.952)
as well as the Washington State Medical Association (2007
Resolution A-7) oppose PAS. The AMA states that "physician
assisted suicide is fundamentally inconsistent with the physician's
professional role." The initiative uses vague language that enable
doctors "acting in good faith" to assist mentally ill or depressed
patients to commit suicide, while protecting doctors from civil and
criminal lawsuits. Health care insurers can cut costs by providing
prescriptions for suicide. Will society's sanction of suicide have
unintended consequences? Sponsor and former governor Booth Gardner
says that this is only a “first step” in legalizing assisted suicide
for anyone who wants it. When society fails to protect vulnerable
people in their troubles, but instead offers them the violence of
suicide, has not society abandoned them? Do
you oppose the availability of physician assisted suicide? Yes.
No one has the right to terminate an innocent life. Killing is
not compassion. Rather, compassion will minister to relieve
the pain, comfort and care for the most ill among us.
MARRIAGE PRESERVATION
8. Children develop best within the context of a biologically
related family. This is a scientifically proven fact which theWashington
State Supreme Court referenced
when in 2006, it ruled on the state's 1998 Defense of Marriage Act
(DOMA). The court determined that the state's limitation of marriage
to heterosexual couples "is constitutional because the legislature
was entitled to believe that limiting marriage to opposite-sex
couples furthers ... the well-being of children by encouraging
families where children are reared in homes headed by the children’s
biological parents." In concurrence, Justice
James Johnson wrote
"The unique and binary biological nature of marriage and its
exclusive link with procreation and responsible child rearing has
defined the institution [of marriage in law]." In
order to affirm and protect children’s rights and the primacy of
those rights over adults’ aspirations for novel family forms, do you
oppose laws that change the definition of marriage to include
homosexual and polygamous relationships?
Yes. The foundation for civilization is the family as it has been
defined from the beginning of recorded time. People are free
to have any relationships they want and to practice whatever sexual
behavior in private. Same sex marriage is not legal for the
same reasons that polygamous marriages are not. They
undermine, corrupt and are incompatible with civilization.
MEDICAL CONSCIENCE CLAUSES
9. "The trend toward accepting the termination of some human lives
as a normal part of medicine is accelerating ... Courts,
policymakers, media leaders - even the elites of organized medicine
- increasingly assert that patient rights and respect for patients’
choices should trump the consciences of medical professionals.
Indeed, the time may soon arrive when doctors, nurses, and
pharmacists will be compelled to take, or be complicit in the taking
of, human life, regardless of their strong religious or moral
objections thereto." (Westlie
J. Smith, 2009).Should
doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other medical professionals be
granted the right to refuse participation in the provision of
medical services that violate the person's moral, ethical or
religious beliefs? Yes.
Our freedom of conscience is one of the most fundamental rights that
we have. No one has the authority to command us to be an
accomplice to an act that in our own conscience is a crime.
10. PUBLIC LIBRARY PORNOGRAPHY In the US Supreme Court ruling United
States v. American Library Association, Inc, 2003, which
upheld the use of library internet pornography filters, Chief
Justice Rehnquist stated for the plurality that "to fulfill their
traditional missions, public libraries must have broad discretion to
decide what material to provide to their patrons. Although
they seek to provide a wide array of information, their goal has
never been to provide 'universal coverage,'" and "most libraries
already exclude pornography from their print collections because
they deem it inappropriate for inclusion." Will
you as a commissioner appoint and confirm only library board
candidates who oppose the inclusion of pornography in public
libraries, whether by internet or print materials?
Yes. I
support the Supreme Court’s position and agree that public libraries
exclude pornography because they deem it to be inappropriate for
inclusion.
11. REGULATION OF SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES
The U.S. Supreme Court in Young
v. American Mini Theaters, Inc., (1976) and Renton
v. Playtime Theater, Inc., (1986), concluded that municipalities
have "substantial governmental interests" in protecting and
preserving the quality of life for its community against the adverse
secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses while allowing for
"reasonable alternative avenues of communication." Land Use
Studies from cities around the United States were cited in both U.S.
Supreme Court cases documenting the harmful secondary effects
including 1. Increased Crime - rape, sexual assault, prostitution
and illegal drug sales; 2. Decreased Property Values - both
residential and commercial; and 3. Urban Blight - people and
businesses fleeing the community. Will
you support municipalities that diligently seek and maintain zoning
ordinances, licensing procedures, permit requirements and
operational regulations which serve to minimize the adverse
secondary effects of Sexually Oriented Businesses?
Yes. Within the limits of the law, I will seek to support land
use regulations that protect and preserve the quality of life for
our community against the adverse secondary effects of sexually
oriented businesses.11.
PUBLIC SCHOOL SEX EDUCATION
12. The typical comprehensive sex education program spends as little
as 5% of the time teaching abstinence principles (Zogby
3/27/07), instead spending significantly more time teaching
students how to put condoms on models of male genitalia and
promoting alternative forms of sexual activity called outercourse,
which may include showering together and mutual masturbation as
effective ways to avoid pregnancy and disease. In contrast, an
emphasis on abstinence means teaching students about building
healthy relationships and bolstering self worth and self-control. Do
you support only sex education that is wholesome, not dehumanizing
and truly safe? Yes.
To do otherwise would be like giving kids driver’s licenses without
teaching them the laws of the roads so they understand their
personal responsibility to obey those laws in order to protect their
lives and the lives of others.
DEATH PENALTY
13. The death penalty in the United States should:
I support capital punishment for heinous crimes where the convicted
offender obviously willfully took the life of another innocent
person. The same Ten Commandments found in the Bible that
includes “Thou shalt not murder” (Thou shalt not take an innocent
life), also appropriates the death penalty for those that do take
innocent life.
GAMING
14. A proposed casino off I-5 near Ridgefield is projected to be one
of the largest in the nation. What is your position on the building
of this casino?
Most states in America have laws that forbid casinos, and for good
reasons. I side with those states for the same reasons and
therefore oppose building casinos in our state.
QUALIFICATIONS AND COMMENTS
15. Please state your qualifications for office such as
professional, educational, family and community accomplishments. You
may also add any any further comments regarding the relationship of
your candidacy to respect life issues.
I believe that we are entrusted with the
responsibility to participate in our representative government.
A long proven track record of servant leadership, good stewardship
and character that bears good fruit, are indispensable
qualifications for anyone to be entrusted with much power and
authority. I am the founder, owner and CEO of a design and
manufacturing company that has grown for 33 years to employ 122
people today. US Digital is completely debt free, healthy,
growing, prospering and thriving even in this economy. We have fun
and actually enjoy designing, manufacturing and selling practical
precision sensor products for factory automation, robotics and the
solar power fields. We build everything in a state-of-the-art
facility here in Vancouver, and export about a third of our products
to overseas customers. I still serve as an inventor, problem
solver, CEO and love working here with an outstanding team of
people.
We apply practical problem solving
principles (that we also see are consistent with the Bible) to focus
on making others successful. About 4 years ago, we prepared
about 17,000 square feet of office space to accommodate Christ
centered ministries in our building after realizing that businesses
can serve a channel of God’s providence to ministries. About a year
ago, we expanded that space to 25,000 square feet which now serves
as a home for 35 ministries at no cost to them. We provide all
their IT needs, utilities, receptionist, copier supplies, meeting
rooms, Etc. They are able to minister more effectively and
network together without the cost of such overhead.
I was not involved in politics all these
years, but focused on our family, business and relationships. About
3 years ago, the dysfunction of our local government became so
obvious that it even got my attention. I began studying and
investigating the state of our community and discovered a real need
for new servant leadership. We needed selfless people with
integrity, sound principles and relevant business experience who
were able and willing to serve others to restore healthy local
government.
I became involved as a citizen advocate
and helped elect some very good people to office. Over the
past year, my wife and I (married 35 years with 3 grown
Christ-following loving daughters) have discussed and prayed about
the right person to run for county commissioner. The fellow
who is currently serving in our district used to be good, but has
changed over the past 8 years.
While our business prospers and thrives,
I have watched our community continue to decline. The leadership
deficit has resulted in high unemployment, closed businesses, homes
lost to foreclosures, excessive taxes, bloating the size and cost of
bureaucracies, and wasteful boondoggles that continue while ignoring
or disenfranchising citizens. Many people have become cynical
and lost their trust in government officials who seem to be
motivated by a “What’s in it for me?” attitude.
It does not need to be this way. We
can do so much better. New leadership can turn this around.
I have diligently searched for qualified candidates, willing to
serve and able to win. Long story short, I ended up being one
of those candidates. I found that my desire to serve others
and work to provide practical solutions at the county level has
compelled me to be one of those willing to serve so our community
can get back on the right track to prosperity.
US Digital has a very capable leadership
team that allows me the freedom to serve full time as a
commissioner. I am a life-long learner and have been a problem
solver and inventor since I was a child. I’ve always enjoyed
inventing and discovering creative solutions that make our world a
better place.
My history includes becoming a licensed
Advanced Class Radio Amateur (WA6HXJ) designing and building my own
equipment at age 16, working in electronics at age 18, and serving
in the US Navy as a nuclear trained electrician’s mate at age 20.
After the Navy, I worked as an FCC licensed Commercial Broadcasting
technician that designed and built custom equipment for a Southern
California Christian TV station. After getting married, I
worked as a senior electronic engineer designing medical ultrasound
imaging equipment, then designed hard disk controller storage
systems for personal computers, and then started US Digital in 1979
designing precision sensors for Robotics and Motion Control.
Over the past 33 years, US Digital has
grown into one of the healthiest, largest, and debt-free businesses
in Vancouver. Our local business paper, the Vancouver Business
Journal is honoring US Digital as a finalist in their 10+ year
category of fastest growing local companies. It pays to
empower others for success to maximize their potential. This
valuable experience convinces me that our community can also prosper
and thrive. We can accomplish great things when we work
together for the good of others and don’t mind who gets the credit.
The same values and principles that grow
strong healthy businesses, also apply to prosper our homes and
governments. Everybody wins when we focus on great customer service,
well thought out priorities, and apply principles that are
resourceful, efficient, practical and realistic based on sound
judgment.
Welcoming the participation of citizens
in the process is one of the smartest things we can do to arrive at
the most balanced, informed, practical, appropriate and efficient
solutions for our community. Campaigning has been quite
enjoyable, especially with the encouragement of an awesome
leadership team working together for the success of this campaign.
I believe that our community can be a much better place with new
servant leadership. Hopefully, our community will agree and
vote to elect such new people.
16. Do you have a
campaign website? What is the address? Yes.
www.DavidMadore.com currently
points to my public Facebook page where I engage in a healthy dialog
with people in our community to discuss a wide variety of issues.
Within a week or so, we plan to direct that domain to a dedicated
campaign website. That site will also include a link to my
public Facebook page.
WEBSITE POSTING PERMISSION
17. May LIFE PAC post your returned survey on our website?
Surveys are posted only with your permission. Yes.
If I am to lead by example in all areas, of course I encourage and
support open transparent honest disclosure in all areas.
|