A CONSISTENT ETHIC OF LIFE IN PUBLIC POLICY
1. A consistent ethic of life (see
here,
here and
here) focuses on
the major life issues of abortion, euthanasia,
persistent poverty,
unjust war, capital punishment, the use of
nuclear arms, violence,
racism and exploitation. While these are
nationally debated issues, there are community
manifestations of these that local governments can
address. Will you as a regional government
official do all in your power and authority to
implement public policies and facilitate community
action that further a consistent respect for all
human life? This position
does not implement public policies but as it
pertains to community action, yes.
ABORTION
2.
Even
dedicated proponents of
abortion acknowledge that life begins at
conception. What do you believe? Does a
unique human life begins at conception? Yes
If not at
conception, when? ___ 3 mths ___ 6 mths ___ 9 mths
___ 1 yr ___ 18 yrs?
3. The 14th Amendment states
"nor shall any state deprive any person of life,
liberty or property without due process of law; nor
deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws." The Supreme Court in
Roe v.
Wade, 1973,
stated that "if this suggestion of personhood is
established, the appellant's case, of course,
collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then
be guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."
The Court regrettably concluded though that "we need
not resolve the difficult question of when life
begins. When those trained in the respective
disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology
are unable to arrive at any consensus, the
judiciary, at this point in the development of man's
knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to
the answer."
Do you believe that the right to life of the
unborn child is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment?
While I understand
the varying arguments to this, I believe in the need
to protect our citizens, born and unborn, within the
bounds of the law. As it pertains to the position of
Freeholder, I am not sure it is relevant at this
level.
4.
Is taking the life of a pre-born child through
abortion ever permissible? Check all that apply:
I cannot speak for everyone as I do not believe it
is anymore my right to do so then it is for others
to speak for me. Accordingly, I am not in a position
to check any of the boxes.
|
_____ No, it's never permissible
_____ Yes, to save mother's life
_____ Yes, in cases of rape or incest
_____
Yes, for physical deformity
_____ Yes, for genetic predispositions
|
_____
Yes, for gender
_____ Yes, for race
_____ Yes, for economic
hardship
_____ Yes, to punish
spouse
_____ Yes, it's always permissible
|
5.
Do you support
parental notification and/or consent before a minor
(under 18 years of age) could have an abortion? A
judicial bypass of parents would be allowed when
necessary. A
2013 poll commissioned by Human Life WA, found
Washington State voters are widely supportive of
laws requiring "parental involvement" in abortion
decisions for girls under the age of 18 (62-29% with
just under 10% undecided).
Read a summary of the results
here. Do you support:
Notification?
Yes
Consent?
Yes
CONTRIBUTIONS OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
6.
"Religious communities are the largest and
best-organized civil institutions in the world,
claiming the allegiance of billions across race,
class, and national divides. These communities have
particular cultural understandings, infrastructures,
and resources to get help where it is needed most" (World
Conference of Religions for Peace).
Southwest Washington has a broad range of religious
communities that contribute substantially to the
welfare of families, children, seniors, the
homeless, sick, and refugees. They are a highly
valued part of our community which respects and
defends human life at every stage. Are you an
active member in a church, synagogue, temple, mosque
or other religious assembly?
If so, you may state
here where at: No
FAITH-BASED AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS
7. The White House's Office of Faith-Based and
Neighborhood Partnerships ensures that religious and
other community organizations are able to compete on
an equal footing for participation in Federal
programs without impairing the character of such
organizations and without diminishing the religious
freedom of those served. Does the
collaboration of government with faith-based
charitable works lawfully ensure fair treatment of
religious organizations, and is it good for our
communities?
I think that anytime a public/private collaboration
that benefits all citizens can come to fruition, it
is a great thing. There are some concerns that need
to be shared amongst all such partnerships, in order
to ensure they are within the bounds of the law.
QUALIFICATIONS
8. Please state your professional experience,
community involvement, education and other
qualifications for a port commission or other
position. I have
worked in several positions over the years and
currently am a small business owner, wherein
planning for the future is tantamount to success. As
a non-partisan freeholder and I am not beholden to
any one person or group, but rather to all of the
people of Clark County, I am the best candidate to
represent the views and desires of our residents for
the purpose of drafting a new charter for the
management direction of Clark County, because I will
take all suggestions to the committee for research
and/or a vote.
POLICY POSITIONS
9. You may state here any policy positions you have
in relation to the office you are seeking:
Since this is not a policy making position, there is
no relativity.
10. May Life PAC post your returned survey on our website? Yes you may. Surveys are posted only with your permission.
