THE NATURE OF PRO-LIFE ISSUES
1. Direct threats to human life include first of
all abortion, which takes the lives of well over
a million US children annually; embryonic stem
cell harvesting; euthanasia; and cloning.
Additional threats to human life include
poverty, capital punishment, racism, war,
nuclear arms proliferation and exploitation.
Since each and every human being is unique and
important, one's personhood or worth should not
be arbitrarily determined by another's choice.
No one exists solely as a means to someone
else's happiness. The choices we make, as
individuals and as a society, must be weighed in
light of their impact on human life and
dignity. Do
you acknowledge both the breadth of pro life
issues, and the primacy of some of those issues,
namely abortion, embryonic stem cell harvesting,
euthanasia, and cloning?
Absolutely.
I took my oath as a military officer and
a civilian employee of the United States
Government to protect and defend the United
States Constitution.
We are guaranteed the right to life,
liberty, and property by the fifth and
fourteenth amendments to the constitution,
rights that are also stated in the second
paragraph, first sentence, of the Declaration of
Independence.
ABORTION 2. Do you believe that a unique
human life begins at conception?
Yes.
If not, when? ___ 3 mths
___ 6 mths ___ 9 mths
___ 1 yr ___ 18 yrs?
|
|
3. The
14th Amendment states "nor shall any state
deprive any person of life, liberty or property
without due process of law; nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws." The Supreme Court in Roe
v. Wade, 1973,
stated that "if this suggestion of personhood is
established, the appellant's case, of course,
collapses, for the fetus' right to life would
then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th]
Amendment." The Court regrettably concluded
though that "we need not resolve the difficult
question of when life begins. When those trained
in the respective disciplines of medicine,
philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at
any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in
the development of man's knowledge, is not in a
position to speculate as to the answer." Do
you believe that the State has a compelling
interest in protecting human life beginning at
conception?
Absolutely.
The duty of government, as stated in
the second paragraph, first sentence, of the
Declaration of Independence, is to safeguard our
life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
As stated in the first paragraph of the
Declaration of Independence, our laws are to
conform to the Laws of Nature (physics, biology,
chemistry; i.e., reality) and the Laws of
Nature’s God (Biblical morality).
In its Roe v. Wade decision, the Supreme
Court violated both of the preceding principles.
4. Is taking the life of a pre-born child
through abortion ever morally permissible?
Check all that apply:
_____ No, it's never permissible
__X___ Yes, to save mother's life
_____ Yes, in cases of rape or incest
____ Yes, for physical deformity
|
_____ Yes, for gender
_____ Yes, for race
_____ Yes, to punish spouse
_____ Yes, it's always permissible
|
Per Bernard Nathanson, a
famous obstetrician who changed from pro baby
killing to pro-life, saving the life of the
mother is a bogus issue.
He said that it is always safer for the
mother to carry the infant to term or perform a
Caesarian Section than it is to perform an
abortion.
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS AND CLONING 5. Do
you oppose embryonic stem cell research or human
cloning, whether publically or privately funded?
Yes.
I am only supportive of adult stem cell
research.
The body will not reject its own stem
cells, but it frequently rejects cells from
other people.
Thus adult stem cell research holds
medical promise, but embryonic stem cell
research is wasteful as well as being
destructive of humans in their embryonic stage
of development.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN ABORTION
6. Peer reviewed studies have shown that
parental involvement laws reduce the occurrence
of risky sex in teens, and more than 30 states
currently have some form of them. Either
the teen refrains from engaging in sex or is
more careful before having sex. These laws
help teen mothers and fathers get the support
and guidance they need from parents in this
important decision. Not having them risks
parental estrangement or alienation from the
child when in the greatest need and denies the
dignity of the family. Minors already must
have parental approval for even the most minor
types of medical procedures or medications and
should also for the complex procedure of
abortion. Without parental
involvement, a minor impregnated by an adult
often times is pressured into having an abortion
so as to conceal the fact that the adult is
guilty of statutory rape. Will you promote/support parental involvement laws (with judicial
override) for minors when seeking an abortion?
Absolutely!
Children belong to the parents, who are
ultimately responsible to God for the children’s
well-being.
Children do not belong to the state or
the school.
Except for parents who are criminally
derelict or abusive, parents should always be
consulted when their minor child seeks an
abortion.
MEDICAL CONSCIENCE CLAUSES
7. "The trend toward accepting the termination
of some human lives as a normal part of medicine
is accelerating ... Courts, policymakers, media
leaders - even the elites of organized medicine
- increasingly assert that patient rights and
respect for patients’ choices should trump the
consciences of medical professionals.
Indeed, the time may soon arrive when doctors,
nurses, and pharmacists will be compelled to
take, or be complicit in the taking of, human
life, regardless of their strong religious or
moral objections thereto." (Westlie
J. Smith, 2009). Should
doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other medical
professionals be granted the right to refuse
participation in the provision of medical
services that violate the person's moral,
ethical or religious beliefs?
Absolutely!
The purpose of government,
as stated in the Declaration of Independence, is
to protect each citizen’s life, liberty, and
pursuit of happiness.
We now have the reality of government
actually compelling medical personnel to
terminate life.
This is criminal on the part of the
government, so certainly medical personnel
should be allowed to refuse to participate in
state-sanctioned murder of innocent people.
PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE
8. Washington
State Initiative 1000 which
was passed in 2008, legalized Physician Assisted
Suicide (PAS) by allowing doctors to prescribe
lethal doses of barbiturates to certain
patients. One objection to this
sanctioning of suicide is that some vulnerable
persons, such as those who are feeble,
depressed, mentally ill, or handicapped, will
likely experience coercion to end their lives.
For them a right to die, already protected in
the Natural Death Act, (RCW
70.122),
may become a duty to die. The American
Medical Association (policy H-140.952)
as well as the Washington State Medical
Association (2007
Resolution A-7)
oppose PAS. The AMA states that "physician
assisted suicide is fundamentally inconsistent
with the physician's professional role."
The initiative uses vague language that enable
doctors "acting in good faith" to assist
mentally ill or depressed patients to commit
suicide, while protecting doctors from civil and
criminal lawsuits. Health care insurers
can cut costs by providing prescriptions for
suicide. Will society's sanction of
suicide have unintended consequences?
Sponsor and former governor Booth Gardner says
that this is only a “first step” in legalizing
assisted suicide for anyone who wants it.
When society fails to protect vulnerable people
in their troubles, but instead offers them the
violence of suicide, has not society abandoned
them? Do
you oppose the availability of
physician-assisted suicide in Washington State?
Absolutely! The Declaration
of Independence states in paragraph 2 that
government exists to guarantee us the right to
life.
The Constitution further codifies this
right to life in the fifth and fourteenth
amendments.
Now certain subversive organizations are
trying to change the right to life into “right
to die,” eventually to change this into the
“duty to die” if the ruling elite consider us to
be a financial or political liability.
MARRIAGE PRESERVATION
9. Children develop best within the
context of a biologically related family.
This is a scientifically proven fact which the Washington
State Supreme Court referenced
when in 2006, it ruled on the state's 1998
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The court
determined that the state's limitation of
marriage to heterosexual couples "is
constitutional because the legislature was
entitled to believe that limiting marriage to
opposite-sex couples furthers ... the well-being
of children by encouraging families where
children are reared in homes headed by the
children’s biological parents." In
concurrence, Justice
James Johnson wrote
"The unique and binary biological nature of
marriage and its exclusive link with procreation
and responsible child rearing has defined the
institution [of marriage in law]." In order to affirm and protect children’s
rights and the primacy of those rights over
adults’ aspirations for novel family forms, do
you oppose laws that change the definition of
marriage to include homosexual and polygamous
relationships?
Sodomy is not a civil right; sodomy is a civil
wrong
PUBLIC SCHOOL SEX EDUCATION
10. The Washington State Legislature in 2007
passed ESSB
5297 requiring
school districts to teach "scientifically
accurate" (aka comprehensive) sex education, if
they teach sex ed at all. The typical
comprehensive sex education program spends as
little as 5% of the time teaching abstinence
principles (Zogby
3/27/07),
instead spending significantly more time
teaching students how to put condoms on models
of male genitalia and promoting alternative
forms of sexual activity called outercourse,
which may include showering together and mutual
masturbation as effective ways to avoid
pregnancy and disease. In contrast, an emphasis
on abstinence means teaching students about
building healthy relationships and bolstering
self worth and self-control. Given
that ESSB 5297 allows school districts a wide
range in how the law is applied, will you work
to maximize sex education that is wholesome, not
dehumanizing and truly safe?
Much of what purports to be
“sex education” seems to be intended to break
down the natural modesty of children, making
“sex education” little more than “promiscuity
indoctrination,” which I believe borders on the
criminal. Sex education should cover
anatomy as part of an overall health education
curriculum that covers other vital systems of
the human body such as the skeletal system,
nervous system, skin, cardio-vascular system,
etc. When the reproductive system is
taught, the genders should be separated, and men
should teach boys and women should teach girls.
Children also should be warned about how
powerful sexual attraction is, how the
entertainment and advertising media employ
sexual attraction to manipulate people’s
behavior, the physical and emotional harm that
results from sexual promiscuity and
experimentation, and the existence of
well-financed special-interest pressure groups
that have malevolent ulterior motives and that
will encourage and affirm sexual
experimentation. Students also should be
taught that boys and girls are different and
have different and complementary strengths and
weaknesses, and that marriage is between one man
and one woman. In addition, students
should be taught the physical and emotional
advantages for maintaining sexual purity until
marriage and remaining sexually faithful to your
husband or wife after marriage.
Ron
Higgins, Candidate for Superintendent for Public
Instruction. The job of the educator is to
assist parents in shepherding their children
from childhood to adulthood. If shepherds are
doing their jobs, they will be very unpopular
with the wolves.
DEATH PENALTY
11. The death penalty in the United States
should:
Capital punishment should
only be used as punishment for murder or
treason.
Capital punishment is permitted by both
the old and new Testaments (Genesis 9:5-6;
Romans 13:4) and by the United States
Constitution in the fifth amendment.
_____ not be used
|
_____ be used about the same
|
_____ be used less
|
_____ be used more
|
GAMING
12. A proposed casino off I-5 near Ridgefield is
projected to be one of the largest in the
nation. What is your position on the
building of this casino?
Gambling adds nothing to the economy and
impoverishes those most vulnerable in society,
so I am opposed to casinos.
QUALIFICATIONS AND COMMENTS
13. Please state your qualifications for office
such as professional, educational, family and
community accomplishments. You may also
add any any further comments regarding the
relationship of your candidacy to respect life
issues.
Certificated
Teaching Experience
I am a
certificated teacher with an endorsement in
mathematics (Certificate No. 464273B).
I have been substitute teaching nearly
every school day since I completed my student
teaching in April 2010.
I am approved to substitute teach in six
school districts (Pasco, Kennewick, Richland,
Kiona-Benton City, Columbia Burbank, and
Finley), and I have substituted in every grade
from pre-school through high school, including
bi-lingual and special education.
Among the subjects that I have taught are
mathematics, science, social studies, language
arts, and physical education.
Classified Teaching Experience
I earned my commercial
driver’s license with a school bus endorsement
in 2010 and drove a school bus for the Pasco
School District as a substitute school bus
driver during the 2010-11 school year.
Other
Teaching/Training/Examiner Experience
·
1989 - Chemistry
lecturer and lab instructor at Scott Community
College in Bettendorf, Iowa
·
1981-86 –
Operator Licensing Examiner for the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission; prepared, administered,
and graded examinations as the final requirement
for personnel prior to their license to operate
a commercial nuclear power plant
·
1978-80 – Trainer
of Certified Reactor Operators at N-Reactor at
Hanford, Washington
·
1975-78 –
Instructor at the Naval Reactors Facility;
taught Naval personnel how to operate nuclear
power plants for Navy ships
·
1972-74 -
Training Office for Marine Corps Air Station
(Helicopter), Tustin, California
·
1969 - Chemistry
lab instructor at California Polytechnic State
University in San Luis Obispo, California
Military
·
Lt. Colonel, US
Marine Corps (Retired)
·
1985-86 –
Officer-in-Charge, Headquarters and Maintenance
Squadron 49, Detachment E, Glenview Naval Air
Station, Glenview, Illinois
·
1971-72 - Marine
Corps helicopter pilot in Vietnam during the
Vietnam War
·
Designated Naval
Aviator
Community
·
Church liaison to
the Tri-Cities Pregnancy Network
·
Speaker at the
Union Gospel Mission in Pasco, Washington, once
a month
·
Regular blood
platelet donor for the Red Cross
Formal
Education
·
Masters of
Science in Chemical Engineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington, 1980
·
Masters of
Science in Aeronautical Systems, University of
West Florida, Pensacola, Florida, 1970
·
Bachelor of
Science in Chemistry, California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis Obispo, California,
1969
Youth
Activities
·
2012 – Mentor for
the Youth Ignite mentoring program, Richland,
Washington
·
2003-07 - Parent
Patrol at Richland High School; as a volunteer,
assisted the staff in monitoring student
activities
·
1994-99 - Youth
Soccer Referee, Richland, Washington
·
1994-98 - Bible
Study Fellowship Children’s Leader, Richland,
Washington
·
1992-96 - Sunday
School Teacher for four-year old children at
West Side Church, Richland, Washington
·
1997-2006 - Boy
Scout Leader, Troop 248, Richland, Washington
·
1994-97 - Cub
Scout Master, Pack 237, Richland, Washington
Personal
·
Married to wife
Deborah for 28 years; two children, one son and
one daughter
·
Both children
graduated from Richland High School and earned
their Associate of Arts degree from Columbia
Basin College via the Running Start program
·
Son was injured
and broke his back one month after graduation
from high school; he is paraplegic and confined
to a wheel chair.
Despite his injury, he earned a
bachelor’s degree in business administration
from Gonzaga University and works in Labor
Relations for CH2M Hill at Hanford, Washington.
·
Daughter
graduated from Walla Walla University with a
bachelor’s degree in mathematics and is
currently attending graduate school at
Washington State University in Pullman,
Washington.
·
My heritage of
public school teachers:
o
My sister is a
retired California public school teacher.
o
My
brother-in-law, my sister’s husband, is a
retired California public school teacher.
o
My niece, my
sister’s daughter, is a California public school
teacher.
o
My mother was a
public school teacher in Missouri, New Jersey,
and California.
o
My aunt, my
mother’s sister, was a public school teacher in
Missouri.
o
My mother’s aunt
was a public school teacher in Missouri.
o
My father’s aunt
was a public school teacher in Missouri.
14. Do you have a campaign website? What
is the address?
Higgins-spi-2012.com
WEBSITE POSTING PERMISSION
15. May LIFE PAC post your survey response on
its website?
Absolutely!
Dare to be a
Daniel,
Dare to stand
alone!
Dare to have a
purpose firm!
Dare to make it
known.
Ron Higgins
Candidate
for Washington State Superintendent of Public
Instruction
Education:
Connecting with the Past, Protecting the
Present, Preparing for the Future.
Matthew
18:1-7
|